Yocto 1.6 Overall Test Plan: Difference between revisions
(26 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
! Version || Modifier || Comments | ! Version || Modifier || Comments | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1.0 || Alexandru Georgescu || | | 1.0 || Alexandru Georgescu || | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
= Test Areas = | = Test Areas = | ||
Each internal project, under {{ns:4}}, is an area subject to a testing process. Areas are grouped by the nature of their functionality, as follows: | Each internal project, under {{ns:4}}, is an area subject to a testing process. Areas are grouped by the nature of their functionality, as follows: | ||
* [[#Build System]] | |||
* [[#Target System]] | |||
* [[#Developer Tools]] | |||
* [[#Distribution Support]] | |||
== Build System == | == Build System == | ||
Line 119: | Line 125: | ||
*; Objective: | *; Objective: | ||
**Track the run-time performance of targeted systems; | **Track the run-time performance of targeted systems; | ||
**Track the run-time performance of targeted systems with gcc security flags; | |||
*; Indicators: | *; Indicators: | ||
Line 124: | Line 131: | ||
** Image size from [[Buildhistory]] to track regression; | ** Image size from [[Buildhistory]] to track regression; | ||
** Piglit test suite results; | ** Piglit test suite results; | ||
** Other benchmarks that can be integrated, such as the ones listed in the [http://openbenchmarking.org/tests/pts openbenchmarking] site. | |||
== Developer Tools == | == Developer Tools == | ||
Line 188: | Line 196: | ||
= Test Cycle = | = Test Cycle = | ||
* Execution according to [[Yocto 1.6 Schedule]]. | * Execution according to [[Yocto 1.6 Schedule]]. The first section of the table, "Build Type", details what type of tests are performed on Weekly, Release Candidate or Release test. | ||
* List of all [[Test Cases]], included in a cycle or not. | * List of all [[Test Cases]], included in a cycle or not. | ||
Line 212: | Line 221: | ||
| yes || yes || yes || yes | | yes || yes || yes || yes | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan=" | ! rowspan="12" | [[#Test Areas]] | ||
! [[#BitBake]] | ! [[#BitBake]] | ||
| yes || yes || yes || | | yes || yes || yes || | ||
Line 218: | Line 227: | ||
! [[#HOB]] | ! [[#HOB]] | ||
| || yes || yes || | | || yes || yes || | ||
|- | |||
! [[#Toaster]] | |||
| || || || yes | |||
|- | |- | ||
! [[#Build Performance]] | ! [[#Build Performance]] | ||
Line 246: | Line 258: | ||
| || || yes || | | || || yes || | ||
|- | |- | ||
! rowspan=" | ! rowspan="11" | Target machine | ||
|- | |- | ||
! qemuarm | ! qemuarm | ||
Line 263: | Line 275: | ||
| yes || yes || yes || | | yes || yes || yes || | ||
|- | |- | ||
! | ! genericx86-64 | ||
| || yes || yes || | |||
|- | |||
! genericx86-64 | |||
| || yes || yes || | | || yes || yes || | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 304: | Line 319: | ||
** Check basic QEMU image functionality, e.g. boot, network, package manager, etc.; | ** Check basic QEMU image functionality, e.g. boot, network, package manager, etc.; | ||
** Establish if testing cycle can continue, depending on the build type. | ** Establish if testing cycle can continue, depending on the build type. | ||
** The tests run on AB are the [[Image tests]]. Their configurations are stored in the AB config files "yocto-autobuilder/buildset-config" depending on the target image types. | |||
== Weekly Test == | == Weekly Test == | ||
Line 339: | Line 355: | ||
** Reduce effort with manual testing, by automating current tests; | ** Reduce effort with manual testing, by automating current tests; | ||
** Improve run-time testing. | ** Improve run-time testing. | ||
** Improve build-time testing. | |||
*; Tools: | *; Tools: | ||
** [[AutoBuilder]] | ** [[AutoBuilder]] | ||
** On [[AutoBuilder]] the [[Image tests]] are run. | |||
** [[Oe-selftest]] | |||
** HW automation [https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1596 1596] | |||
= Validation = | = Validation = | ||
*; Objective: | *; Objective: | ||
** Verify the correct functionality of new changes introduced in version 1. | ** Verify the correct functionality of [https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.6_Features new] changes introduced in version 1.6 of the {{ns:4}}. | ||
*; Entry criteria: | *; Entry criteria: | ||
** The change is tracked and prioritized in [https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/ Bugzilla]; | ** The change is tracked and prioritized in [https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/ Bugzilla]; | ||
** Bugzilla entry has a target milestone within version 1.6; | ** Bugzilla entry has a target milestone within version 1.6; | ||
** The change is documented or pointed out when no documentation is necessary; | ** The change is documented or pointed out when no documentation is necessary (the doc flag is set accordingly); | ||
** Bug status is set to RESOLVED. | ** Bug status is set to RESOLVED. | ||
Line 360: | Line 380: | ||
*; References: | *; References: | ||
** [[Yocto 1.6 Features]] | ** [[Yocto 1.6 Features]] | ||
** | ** [[1.6 qa owned bugs]] - this wiki was created for QA to track easily resolved bugs and features | ||
** [[Yocto Project v1.6 Status]] | |||
== New features validation and QA integration == | |||
*; Objective: | |||
** QA will follow the [[#Validation]] process on verifying the new [[Yocto 1.6 Features]] and integrating them in the testing process. | |||
*; Some of the areas that need to be tested: | |||
** uClibc integration | |||
** performance using gcc security flags | |||
** New Kernel functionalities listed in the [[Kernel/1.6 Planning]] | |||
** Shuku proposal | |||
** SystemD complete integration | |||
** HW automation | |||
= Test Report = | = Test Report = |
Latest revision as of 15:20, 10 December 2013
Reversion history
Version | Modifier | Comments |
---|---|---|
1.0 | Alexandru Georgescu |
Introduction
This article is the overall test plan for version 1.6 of the Yocto Project. It contains an overview of the testing process, such as testing areas, types, cycles and reports, along with a summary and objective for each of the conducted validation activities. Further on, sections may be linked to other articles that contain further details or information related to them. Note that the information provided in this article, or articles linked here, is subject to changes when needed as to reflect the actual activities held for the current version of the Yocto Project.
Objectives
The test process is mainly focused to track and review the quality and performance of the Yocto Project, along with its reference system and internal projects. The plan also includes identifying and tracking areas subject to improvement, regression, validation of enhancements and bugs, development of testing methods with emphasis on automated testing. Documentation and licensing status is not included in the scope of the testing process, unless otherwise noted e.g. as part of the process of verifying new features.
Test Areas
Each internal project, under Yocto Project, is an area subject to a testing process. Areas are grouped by the nature of their functionality, as follows:
Build System
The build engine and the surrounding components, that provide the means to build an image or bake a bit of software. In this area the build-time tests are executed.
BitBake
Functional testing of BitBake, as a build engine with all its features and components against various configuration and scenarios.
HOB
Functional and usability testing of HOB as a graphical user interface for BitBake.
Toaster
Toaster is a Web-based interface to the Bitbake build system and the Poky distribution inside the Yocto Project. This project was formely known as Web Hob / Webhob / webhob, and you may still find references to the old name in the documentation. The Toaster testing plan wiki covers all the validation performed agasint Toaster. The test process focuses mostly on validating the data collected from the build process and verifying the correct functionality of the Toaster GUI.
Metadata
Testing the core metadata of the Yocto Project is mainly covered in the overall testing process, through other #Test Areas like #BitBake and #HOB mentioned above.
Build Performance
The performance of the build system is tracked, with regards to time spent on passing through a build process, in multiple, commonly used, configurations.
- Tool
- http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/scripts/contrib/build-perf-test.sh
- Results page
- Performance Test
Additionally, build performance will be tracked with/without security flags enabled. The first step is to have several build combinations of core-image-minimal, core-image-sato and core-image-sato-sdk and see the build time differences between the builds.
Target System
Area focused on a target operating system or an application that comes with it, as the output of a build process. In this area the run-time tests are executed.
Machine type | Target machine | System Testing | #Compliance Testing | #Stress Testing | #System Performance | #Application Development Toolkit | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#QEMU Machine | |||||||
qemuarm | yes | yes | |||||
qemumips | yes | yes | |||||
qemuppc | yes | yes | |||||
qemux86 | yes | yes | |||||
qemux86-64 | yes | yes | yes | ||||
#BSP Machine | |||||||
genericx86 | yes | ||||||
genericx86-64 | yes | ||||||
beagleboard | yes | yes | yes | ||||
mpc8315e-rdb | yes | yes | |||||
routerstationpro | yes | yes |
QEMU Machine
Covering all core, QEMU, machine definitions:
- qemuarm
- qemumips
- qemuppc
- qemux86
- qemux86-64
BSP Machine
Covering BSPs included in the Yocto Project:
- genericx86
- genericx86-64
- beagleboard
- mpc8315e-rdb
- routerstationpro
Compliance Testing
Compliance test suites / frameworks used:
- LSB tests
- POSIX tests
- LTP tests
Stress Testing
Stress tests are run on Beagleboard and Jasperforest BSPs. Details as follow:
- Beagleboard core-image-sato-sdk image is tested using LTP and Crashme stress tests
- Jasperforest core-image-lsb-sdk image is tested using Helltest and Crashme stress tests
System Performance
- Objective
- Track the run-time performance of targeted systems;
- Track the run-time performance of targeted systems with gcc security flags;
- Indicators
- Boot time for systemd and sysvinit;
- Image size from Buildhistory to track regression;
- Piglit test suite results;
- Other benchmarks that can be integrated, such as the ones listed in the openbenchmarking site.
Developer Tools
Application Development Toolkit
ADT testing includes tests for ADT-installer, meta-toolchain-sdk and user build sdk. It will be covered in Weekly and Fullpass testing.
- Cross-toolchain install&compiling Test
- relocatable SDK
- ADT installer
- toolchain tarballs
- yocto build tree
Eclipse IDE Plugin
Eclipse plugin tests will cover the basic functionalities. This includes installation, configuring Yocto Project ADT settings, Yocto BSP, Bitbake project and project compiling and deployment to the target. Based on the features that will be implemented, new test cases will be added, to support Windows and Mac support. This will be more detailed in the Features section.
- headless build
- C/C++ project creation
- debug/deploy
- user space tools
- Bitbake project
Depending on the new SDK features (e.g. MacOS and Windows support), additional tests will be run in order to validate the new features.
Build Appliance
The basic functionality of the Build appliance will be tested. The tests consists on building successfully a build-appliance-image, launch HOB.
Distribution Support
- Criteria
- The OS distribution version is still maintained at the time of the Yocto Project release (1.6 release date is: Apr. 25, 2014)
- Coverage
- Following a table with targeted distribution and versions:
Distro | Version | Release | EOL |
---|---|---|---|
Ubuntu | |||
13.10 | October 17, 2013 | July 2014 | |
14.04 | April 17, 2014 | ||
Fedora | |||
19 | January 15, 2013 | ||
20 | December 17, 2013 | ||
CentOS | |||
5 | ~ | March 31, 2017 | |
6 | ~ | November 30, 2020 | |
Debian | |||
6 | February 6th, 2011 | obsolete | |
7 | May 4th, 2013 | current | |
openSUSE | |||
12.3 | May 28, 2013 | ~ | |
13.1 | Nov 16, 2013 | ~ |
Test Cycle
- Execution according to Yocto 1.6 Schedule. The first section of the table, "Build Type", details what type of tests are performed on Weekly, Release Candidate or Release test.
- List of all Test Cases, included in a cycle or not.
Test execution cycle | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
#Sanity Test | #Weekly Test | #Full Pass Test | #Release Test | ||
Build type | |||||
Daily (M.U.T.) | yes | ||||
Weekly | yes | yes | |||
Release Candidate | yes | yes | yes | ||
Release | yes | yes | yes | yes | |
#Test Areas | #BitBake | yes | yes | yes | |
#HOB | yes | yes | |||
#Toaster | yes | ||||
#Build Performance | yes | ||||
#QEMU Image | yes | yes | yes | ||
#BSP Image | yes | yes | |||
#Compliance Testing | yes | ||||
#Stress Testing | yes | ||||
#System Performance | yes | ||||
#Application Development Toolkit | yes | yes | |||
#Eclipse IDE Plugin | yes | yes | yes | ||
#Build Appliance | yes | ||||
Target machine | |||||
qemuarm | yes | yes | yes | ||
qemumips | yes | yes | yes | ||
qemuppc | yes | yes | yes | ||
qemux86 | yes | yes | yes | ||
qemux86-64 | yes | yes | yes | ||
genericx86-64 | yes | yes | |||
genericx86-64 | yes | yes | |||
beagleboard | yes | yes | yes | ||
mpc8315e-rdb | yes | yes | |||
routerstationpro | yes | yes | yes | ||
Target image | |||||
core-image-sato | yes | ||||
core-image-sato-dev | yes | ||||
core-image-sato-sdk | yes | yes | yes | yes | |
core-image-minimal | yes | ||||
core-image-minimal-dev | yes |
Sanity Test
Brief and quick automated tests, with execution time of maximum 10 minutes.
- Scope
- Each build process triggered on the AutoBuilder.
- Objective
- Build finished with no errors;
- Check basic QEMU image functionality, e.g. boot, network, package manager, etc.;
- Establish if testing cycle can continue, depending on the build type.
- The tests run on AB are the Image tests. Their configurations are stored in the AB config files "yocto-autobuilder/buildset-config" depending on the target image types.
Weekly Test
- Scope
- Images built weekly and released through the distribution team.
- Passed #Sanity Test
- Objective
- Functionality test on most areas with minimum sets of tests;
- Regression test with high probability to find bugs.
Full Pass Test
- Scope
- Images built as candidates for milestone or final release;
- Passed #Weekly Test
- Objective
- Ensure functionality of all Yocto Project components.
Release Test
- Scope
- Release candidates that pass #Full pass test
- Objective
- All scheduled features are covered, or rescheduled;
- All relevant bugs are fixed and verified.
- Coverage
- Stress test on RC
- Compliance test on RC
- Distribution test on RC
Test Automation
- Objectives
- Reduce effort with manual testing, by automating current tests;
- Improve run-time testing.
- Improve build-time testing.
- Tools
- AutoBuilder
- On AutoBuilder the Image tests are run.
- Oe-selftest
- HW automation 1596
Validation
- Objective
- Verify the correct functionality of new changes introduced in version 1.6 of the Yocto Project.
- Entry criteria
- The change is tracked and prioritized in Bugzilla;
- Bugzilla entry has a target milestone within version 1.6;
- The change is documented or pointed out when no documentation is necessary (the doc flag is set accordingly);
- Bug status is set to RESOLVED.
- Exit criteria
- The change is well documented for writing test case, where applicable;
- Planned test case has passed;
- Bug status is set to VERIFIED.
- References
- Yocto 1.6 Features
- 1.6 qa owned bugs - this wiki was created for QA to track easily resolved bugs and features
- Yocto Project v1.6 Status
New features validation and QA integration
- Objective
- QA will follow the #Validation process on verifying the new Yocto 1.6 Features and integrating them in the testing process.
- Some of the areas that need to be tested
- uClibc integration
- performance using gcc security flags
- New Kernel functionalities listed in the Kernel/1.6 Planning
- Shuku proposal
- SystemD complete integration
- HW automation
Test Report
- Objectives
- Show a live 1.6 QA Status of the active test runs, on the latest build;
- Send out an report email to the Yocto Project mailing list at the end of a test cycle;
- Archive reports at 1.6 qa run history;
- Use QA Status TEMPLATE for reporting;
- Use Testopia as a tool for reporting;