LSB Result

Introduction

The Linux Standard Base(LSB) was created to lower the overall costs of supporting the Linux platform. By reducing the differences between individual Linux distributions, the LSB greatly reduces the costs involved with porting applications to different distributions, as well as lowers the cost and effort involved in after-market support of those applications. (http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/lsb)

result

Below table shows the problems of LSB Test

• Known Problem: LSB bug or known problem
• Failure:
  • fixed: the number of fixed failures
  • LTP: native failures
  • NAB: Not-A-Bug, the number of the failures which come from miss of some packages due to the profile definition, or can't reproduce locally
  • pending: the analysis is done with bug reported, but pending for final solution
  • duplicated: the number of failures which are same as on other platforms which have been analyzed already
• similarity: similarity to Qemux86 which is chosen as the base. most cases are common on all targets

(click the title like "qemux86" to check detail data for that target

Status	Qemux86	Qemux86_64	Qemuppc	Qemuarm	Qemumips	netbook	blacksand	beagleboard	routerstation	Jasperforest (lsb-sdk)	mpc8315e-rdb
total	1072	n/a	1071	1071	1081	n/a	n/a	1174	1182	1198
failures	34	32	34	37	37	33	29	35	145 (*)	20
audit	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	0(0%)	0(0%)
fixed	6	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
NAB	26	1	1	4	1	2	1	0	0	0	0
LTP	2	2	0	0	1	0	0	0	0
Duplicated	0	29	33	29	29	31	28	35	0	13
pending	0	0	0	3	0	0	0	0	0
similarity	100%	90%	88%	78%	78%	90%	96%	85%	19%

* on routerstation kernel is not configured correctly. Lots of new failures 
  are related to IPC, which may come from lacking of some kernel options. This
  has been verified with newer 2.6.37 kernel recently, that only ~60 failures
  remaining. So the analysis is skipped for it in this cycle.