Security: Difference between revisions
SonaSarmadi (talk | contribs) |
SonaSarmadi (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
'''Regression test''' | '''Regression test''' | ||
Build the core image for at least two architectures (preferably one big-endian and one little-endian) | * Build the core image for at least two architectures (preferably one big-endian and one little-endian) | ||
Run ptest (for those branches/packages that there is ptest mechanism) | * Run ptest (for those branches/packages that there is ptest mechanism) | ||
== Patch name convention and commit comment == | == Patch name convention and commit comment == | ||
Revision as of 08:51, 11 November 2014
Since the Yocto Project is intended to be flexible and meet the needs of many applications, we leave policy-making decisions around security to our end users. Our goal instead is to ship each release with metadata that follows best practices in that we do not release recipe versions which are known to have significant security vulnerabilities. Generally this is done by upgrading recipes to newer versions that are no longer vulnerable to these issues.
We are tracking security vulnerabilities in the Yocto Project against the National Vulnerability Database.
Branches that are maintained with security fixes
| Major version | Current Version | Branch name | BitBake version | Maintainer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7 | 1.7 | dizzy | 1.24 | Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com> |
| 1.6 | 1.6.1 | daisy | 1.22 | Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> |
| 1.5 | 1.5.3 | dora | 1.20 | Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> |
| 1.4 | 1.4.3* | dylan | 1.18 | Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> |
| 1.3 | 1.3.2 | danny | 1.16 | Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com> |
All CVEs (security patches) should be backported to all branches above (if possible) except versions in grey.
Versions in grey are no longer actively maintained, but well-tested security patches may still be accepted for them.)
See Stable branchesfor the detailed info regarding the policies and maintenance of Stable branch
Kernel security patches
Kernel security patches are backported to Linux-yoco kernels regularly from https://www.kernel.org/
Linux-yocto
linux-yocto_3.10 & linux-yocto_3.14 (maintainer: Ross Burton)
Vendor kernels
Kernel security patches are also backported to Linux-vendor kernels from https://www.kernel.org/
- meta-intel (meta-intel uses Linux-yocto)
- meta-fsl-ppc (maintainer: xxx)
- meta-fsl-arm (maintainer: xxx)
- meta-xilinx (maintainer: xxx)
- meta-ti (maintainer: xxx)
- etc
How to test
If there is any test case for the vulnerability by the upstream project or community
- Run the test to reproduce the problem and after applying the correction to verify that the problem is solved. - Run the regression test
If there isn’t any test case and it is complicated and time consuming to write a testcase
- Run the regressions test
Regression test
- Build the core image for at least two architectures (preferably one big-endian and one little-endian)
- Run ptest (for those branches/packages that there is ptest mechanism)
Patch name convention and commit comment
Security patches should have reference to the CVE identifier both in the patch file/s and the commit comment.
Please make sure to add the package name in the subject and the reference to the CVE. Example for the commit comment:
bash: CVE-2014-6278 <short description> References E.g. linke to CVE or other useful info/blog/advisory. Signed-off-by: <your email addres> Signed-off-by: xxxx
For additional guideline refer to: Commit Patch Message Guidelines
