Feb17th IRC LOG: Difference between revisions

From Yocto Project
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with '<pidge> Hi everyone. We're going to start our scheduled bug scrub now. This should last for about 30 to 45 minutes but we can go over that if needed. First though, if you're here…')
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<pidge> Hi everyone. We're going to start our scheduled bug scrub now. This should last for about 30 to 45 minutes but we can go over that if needed. First though, if you're here for the bugscrub could you please check in for my logs with a quick pong.
<br><pidge> Hi everyone. We're going to start our scheduled bug scrub now. This should last for about 30 to 45 minutes but we can go over that if needed. First though, if you're here for the bugscrub could you please check in for my logs with a quick pong.
<lianhao> pong
<br><lianhao> pong
<dcui> dcui:pong
<br><dcui> dcui:pong
<meilei007> pong
<br><meilei007> pong
<KevinTian> pong
<br><KevinTian> pong
<dcui> pong
<br><dcui> pong
<gzhai> pong
<br><gzhai> pong
<pidge> We're going to be working from bugzilla. Since there's only the 5 folks here, we'll go through open defects assigned to you and then check on New defects.
<br><pidge> We're going to be working from bugzilla. Since there's only the 5 folks here, we'll go through open defects assigned to you and then check on New defects.
<pidge> lianhao: Bug 519, any updates?
<br><pidge> lianhao: Bug 519, any updates?
<lianhao> Jessica have postpone it into 1.1.
<br><lianhao> Jessica have postpone it into 1.1.
<lianhao> Though I may try to fix it in 1.0 M4 if I have free time
<br><lianhao> Though I may try to fix it in 1.0 M4 if I have free time
<pidge> thank you. dcui: 726, any updates?
<br><pidge> thank you. dcui: 726, any updates?
<dcui> bug 726: I have sent out the fix, but looks Saul neglected it. will ping saul.
<br><dcui> bug 726: I have sent out the fix, but looks Saul neglected it. will ping saul.
<pidge> ok, please make sure your Pull has the bug number in it. 417?
<br><pidge> ok, please make sure your Pull has the bug number in it. 417?
<dcui> sure. I have bug ID in the git commit.
<br><dcui> sure. I have bug ID in the git commit.
<dcui> bug 417: I'm re-testing the bugs
<br><dcui> bug 417: I'm re-testing the bugs
<dcui> bug 417: if I can't reproduce the issue, I'll close the bug
<br><dcui> bug 417: if I can't reproduce the issue, I'll close the bug
<pidge> great, thank you. 412?
<br><pidge> great, thank you. 412?
<dcui> bug 412: I'm currently working on this.
<br><dcui> bug 412: I'm currently working on this.
<pidge> ok and lastly and this one is very old: 61?
<br><pidge> ok and lastly and this one is very old: 61?
<dcui> bug 61: it's postponed to 1.1, but I'll try to look into that after I fix the others.
<br><dcui> bug 61: it's postponed to 1.1, but I'll try to look into that after I fix the others.
<pidge> ok, thank you. meilei007: I don't see any bugs assigned to you. So we'll go to KevinTian: 485?
<br><pidge> ok, thank you. meilei007: I don't see any bugs assigned to you. So we'll go to KevinTian: 485?
<KevinTian> LET ME CHECK
<br><KevinTian> LET ME CHECK
<KevinTian> that can't be reproduced. I'm waiting for more information. If it doesn't occur in next Milestone test, I'll close it
<br><KevinTian> that can't be reproduced. I'm waiting for more information. If it doesn't occur in next Milestone test, I'll close it
<pidge> ok, great. 172?
<br><pidge> ok, great. 172?
<KevinTian> it's postponed to 1.1, I think
<br><KevinTian> it's postponed to 1.1, I think
<pidge> ok,  169?
<br><pidge> ok,  169?
<KevinTian> I'll close that one since all information are now in wiki
<br><KevinTian> I'll close that one since all information are now in wiki
<KevinTian> it's originally there for tracking purpose only
<br><KevinTian> it's originally there for tracking purpose only
<pidge> great: 78, another old one?
<br><pidge> great: 78, another old one?
<pidge> understood.
<br><pidge> understood.
<KevinTian> yeah, an old one. we decided to move it to 1.1
<br><KevinTian> yeah, an old one. we decided to move it to 1.1
<KevinTian> but if I have time, I may take a look in 1.0 M4. :-)
<br><KevinTian> but if I have time, I may take a look in 1.0 M4. :-)
<pidge> ok, excellent. thank you. :)
<br><pidge> ok, excellent. thank you. :)
<pidge> gzhai: I don't see any defects assigned to you. Is this correct?
<br><pidge> gzhai: I don't see any defects assigned to you. Is this correct?
<gzhai> no.
<br><gzhai> no.
<gzhai> I have many bugs:(
<br><gzhai> I have many bugs:(
<pidge> oh? what is your real name?
<br><pidge> oh? what is your real name?
<gzhai> edwin.zhai
<br><gzhai> edwin.zhai
<pidge> oh, edwin! sorry, didn't recognize you!
<br><pidge> oh, edwin! sorry, didn't recognize you!
* pidge looks at edwins list and gasps :(
* pidge looks at edwins list and gasps :(
<pidge> ok, let's go with the old ones and see if we can close some of these
<br><pidge> ok, let's go with the old ones and see if we can close some of these
<gzhai> okay
<br><gzhai> okay
<pidge> 56?
<br><pidge> 56?
<gzhai> I asked bob to provide more details, bug got no response.
<br><gzhai> I asked bob to provide more details, bug got no response.
<pidge> let's close this. 2 years old and no info.
<br><pidge> let's close this. 2 years old and no info.
<pidge> 27?
<br><pidge> 27?
<gzhai> I know some issues of array key
<br><gzhai> I know some issues of array key
<gzhai> but know sure if it's this bug.
<br><gzhai> but know sure if it's this bug.
<gzhai> we can keep this, I think
<br><gzhai> we can keep this, I think
<pidge> closing it. the bug is vague
<br><pidge> closing it. the bug is vague
<pidge> 29?
<br><pidge> 29?
<pidge> should I reopen 27 then?
<br><pidge> should I reopen 27 then?
<gzhai> It's okay, I think
<br><gzhai> It's okay, I think
<pidge> ok
<br><pidge> ok
<gzhai> I have not try bug 29.
<br><gzhai> I have not try bug 29.
<pidge> ok. it's really old so I'm going to mark it as closed and obsolete.
<br><pidge> ok. it's really old so I'm going to mark it as closed and obsolete.
<pidge> 35?
<br><pidge> 35?
<gzhai> I understand this bug. pls. keep it
<br><gzhai> I understand this bug. pls. keep it
<gzhai> I'll look at it if I have time
<br><gzhai> I'll look at it if I have time
<gzhai> it's for 1.1
<br><gzhai> it's for 1.1
<pidge> 35 is?
<br><pidge> 35 is?
<gzhai> yes, 35.
<br><gzhai> yes, 35.
<pidge> ok. 37?
<br><pidge> ok. 37?
<gzhai> postponed to 1.1.
<br><gzhai> postponed to 1.1.
<gzhai> need add generic icon
<br><gzhai> need add generic icon
<pidge> ok
<br><pidge> ok
<pidge> 51?
<br><pidge> 51?
<gzhai> have not looked at it.
<br><gzhai> have not looked at it.
<pidge> ok.  3 years old, closing it
<br><pidge> ok.  3 years old, closing it
<pidge> 71?
<br><pidge> 71?
<gzhai> postponed to 1.1
<br><gzhai> postponed to 1.1
<pidge> ok
<br><pidge> ok
<gzhai> the menu is useless.
<br><gzhai> the menu is useless.
<pidge> 110?
<br><pidge> 110?
<pidge> 1.1, correct?
<br><pidge> 1.1, correct?
<gzhai> 1.1: need rebase some patches
<br><gzhai> 1.1: need rebase some patches
<gzhai> yes. 71 for 1.1. already there
<br><gzhai> yes. 71 for 1.1. already there
<pidge> ok, 732?
<br><pidge> ok, 732?
<gzhai> working on it with lower priority.
<br><gzhai> working on it with lower priority.
<pidge> 456?
<br><pidge> 456?
<gzhai> working on it now.
<br><gzhai> working on it now.
<pidge> 488?
<br><pidge> 488?
<gzhai> working on it now.
<br><gzhai> working on it now.
<pidge> 688?
<br><pidge> 688?
<gzhai> will look at it after 456&488.
<br><gzhai> will look at it after 456&488.
<pidge> ok, and lastly 697. reproduceable?
<br><pidge> ok, and lastly 697. reproduceable?
<gzhai> latest image works well.
<br><gzhai> latest image works well.
<gzhai> need tom confirm.
<br><gzhai> need tom confirm.
<gzhai> i'll change it to NEEDINFO.
<br><gzhai> i'll change it to NEEDINFO.
<pidge> ok, could you mark it as resolved worksforme. if we need to reopen it we can.
<br><pidge> ok, could you mark it as resolved worksforme. if we need to reopen it we can.
<gzhai> okay.
<br><gzhai> okay.
<pidge> ok, it looks like we have 2 new defects, 738 and 739. Anyone have comments on them?
<br><pidge> ok, it looks like we have 2 new defects, 738 and 739. Anyone have comments on them?
<gzhai> wait..
<br><gzhai> wait..
<pidge> ok
<br><pidge> ok
<gzhai> You can assign 738 to me.
<br><gzhai> You can assign 738 to me.
<gzhai> no comments for 739.
<br><gzhai> no comments for 739.
<pidge> gzhai: ok, done. also we have 740 in. I think this may be fixed in the most recent master
<br><pidge> gzhai: ok, done. also we have 740 in. I think this may be fixed in the most recent master
<pidge> but it's midnight here and I'm too sleepy to verify that.
<br><pidge> but it's midnight here and I'm too sleepy to verify that.

Latest revision as of 08:03, 18 February 2011


<pidge> Hi everyone. We're going to start our scheduled bug scrub now. This should last for about 30 to 45 minutes but we can go over that if needed. First though, if you're here for the bugscrub could you please check in for my logs with a quick pong.
<lianhao> pong
<dcui> dcui:pong
<meilei007> pong
<KevinTian> pong
<dcui> pong
<gzhai> pong
<pidge> We're going to be working from bugzilla. Since there's only the 5 folks here, we'll go through open defects assigned to you and then check on New defects.
<pidge> lianhao: Bug 519, any updates?
<lianhao> Jessica have postpone it into 1.1.
<lianhao> Though I may try to fix it in 1.0 M4 if I have free time
<pidge> thank you. dcui: 726, any updates?
<dcui> bug 726: I have sent out the fix, but looks Saul neglected it. will ping saul.
<pidge> ok, please make sure your Pull has the bug number in it. 417?
<dcui> sure. I have bug ID in the git commit.
<dcui> bug 417: I'm re-testing the bugs
<dcui> bug 417: if I can't reproduce the issue, I'll close the bug
<pidge> great, thank you. 412?
<dcui> bug 412: I'm currently working on this.
<pidge> ok and lastly and this one is very old: 61?
<dcui> bug 61: it's postponed to 1.1, but I'll try to look into that after I fix the others.
<pidge> ok, thank you. meilei007: I don't see any bugs assigned to you. So we'll go to KevinTian: 485?
<KevinTian> LET ME CHECK
<KevinTian> that can't be reproduced. I'm waiting for more information. If it doesn't occur in next Milestone test, I'll close it
<pidge> ok, great. 172?
<KevinTian> it's postponed to 1.1, I think
<pidge> ok, 169?
<KevinTian> I'll close that one since all information are now in wiki
<KevinTian> it's originally there for tracking purpose only
<pidge> great: 78, another old one?
<pidge> understood.
<KevinTian> yeah, an old one. we decided to move it to 1.1
<KevinTian> but if I have time, I may take a look in 1.0 M4. :-)
<pidge> ok, excellent. thank you. :)
<pidge> gzhai: I don't see any defects assigned to you. Is this correct?
<gzhai> no.
<gzhai> I have many bugs:(
<pidge> oh? what is your real name?
<gzhai> edwin.zhai
<pidge> oh, edwin! sorry, didn't recognize you!

  • pidge looks at edwins list and gasps :(


<pidge> ok, let's go with the old ones and see if we can close some of these
<gzhai> okay
<pidge> 56?
<gzhai> I asked bob to provide more details, bug got no response.
<pidge> let's close this. 2 years old and no info.
<pidge> 27?
<gzhai> I know some issues of array key
<gzhai> but know sure if it's this bug.
<gzhai> we can keep this, I think
<pidge> closing it. the bug is vague
<pidge> 29?
<pidge> should I reopen 27 then?
<gzhai> It's okay, I think
<pidge> ok
<gzhai> I have not try bug 29.
<pidge> ok. it's really old so I'm going to mark it as closed and obsolete.
<pidge> 35?
<gzhai> I understand this bug. pls. keep it
<gzhai> I'll look at it if I have time
<gzhai> it's for 1.1
<pidge> 35 is?
<gzhai> yes, 35.
<pidge> ok. 37?
<gzhai> postponed to 1.1.
<gzhai> need add generic icon
<pidge> ok
<pidge> 51?
<gzhai> have not looked at it.
<pidge> ok. 3 years old, closing it
<pidge> 71?
<gzhai> postponed to 1.1
<pidge> ok
<gzhai> the menu is useless.
<pidge> 110?
<pidge> 1.1, correct?
<gzhai> 1.1: need rebase some patches
<gzhai> yes. 71 for 1.1. already there
<pidge> ok, 732?
<gzhai> working on it with lower priority.
<pidge> 456?
<gzhai> working on it now.
<pidge> 488?
<gzhai> working on it now.
<pidge> 688?
<gzhai> will look at it after 456&488.
<pidge> ok, and lastly 697. reproduceable?
<gzhai> latest image works well.
<gzhai> need tom confirm.
<gzhai> i'll change it to NEEDINFO.
<pidge> ok, could you mark it as resolved worksforme. if we need to reopen it we can.
<gzhai> okay.
<pidge> ok, it looks like we have 2 new defects, 738 and 739. Anyone have comments on them?
<gzhai> wait..
<pidge> ok
<gzhai> You can assign 738 to me.
<gzhai> no comments for 739.
<pidge> gzhai: ok, done. also we have 740 in. I think this may be fixed in the most recent master
<pidge> but it's midnight here and I'm too sleepy to verify that.