Yocto 1.1 Milestone Test Report: Difference between revisions
From Yocto Project
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==== Yocto 1.1 M1 RC2 Fullpass Test Report ==== | ==== Yocto 1.1 M1 RC2 Fullpass Test Report ==== | ||
This is the fullpass test report for Yocto 1.1 M1 RC2 build. There are 3 new bugs found in this testing compared with weekly testing. Non-GPLv3 build could not work and one new LTP failure found with new kernel. The 2 BLOCK issues on have been addressed and a new build is ready for QA testing. Except for LTP and POSIX failures, there are 13 open bugs for RC2 build. Grub installation fails on 3 intel BSPs. Graphics testing on sugarbay is blocked because there are no mesa-demos and libSDL.so installed. | |||
Helltest and Crashme could pass 24 hours testing on Jasperforest. Idle power consumption of sugarbay and crownbay are 40.12W and 18.72W respectively. LTP and POSIX testing is finished but the result analysis is still on-going. | |||
Test Summary | |||
--------------------------------------- | |||
Revision as of 13:48, 7 June 2011
This page is to hold Milestone Test Report for Yocto 1.1
Yocto 1.1 M1 RC2 Fullpass Test Report
This is the fullpass test report for Yocto 1.1 M1 RC2 build. There are 3 new bugs found in this testing compared with weekly testing. Non-GPLv3 build could not work and one new LTP failure found with new kernel. The 2 BLOCK issues on have been addressed and a new build is ready for QA testing. Except for LTP and POSIX failures, there are 13 open bugs for RC2 build. Grub installation fails on 3 intel BSPs. Graphics testing on sugarbay is blocked because there are no mesa-demos and libSDL.so installed. Helltest and Crashme could pass 24 hours testing on Jasperforest. Idle power consumption of sugarbay and crownbay are 40.12W and 18.72W respectively. LTP and POSIX testing is finished but the result analysis is still on-going.
Test Summary
