Security: Difference between revisions

From Yocto Project
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 133: Line 133:
* meta-intel (meta-intel uses Linux-yocto)
* meta-intel (meta-intel uses Linux-yocto)
* meta-fsl-ppc (meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org)
* meta-fsl-ppc (meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org)
* meta-fsl-arm (maintainer: xxx)
* meta-xilinx (meta-xilinx@lists.yoctoproject.org)
* meta-xilinx (meta-xilinx@lists.yoctoproject.org)
* meta-ti (meta-ti@yoctoproject.org)
* meta-ti (meta-ti@yoctoproject.org)

Revision as of 06:47, 10 March 2015

Since the Yocto Project is intended to be flexible and meet the needs of many applications, we leave policy-making decisions around security to our end users. Our goal instead is to ship each release with metadata that follows best practices in that we do not release recipe versions which are known to have significant security vulnerabilities. Generally this is done by upgrading recipes to newer versions that are no longer vulnerable to these issues.

Upgrading recipes to the newer versions in the maintenance branches is not always easy, this is why we provide a patch for the existing version instead if we detect a vulnerability in a package. The patches are added to the recipes, see example below:

 poky/recipes-connectivity/bind/bind_9.9.5.bb
 
 SRC_URI = "ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/${PV}/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.gz \
          file://conf.patch \
          ...
          file://bind9_9_5-CVE-2014-8500.patch \


We are tracking security vulnerabilities in the Yocto Project against the National Vulnerability Database.

We also track CVEs reported to the oss-security list (Open Source Software Security) http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/


Yocto Security Team

The purpose of creating a security team in the Yocto project is to discuss, sync and organize security related activities.

The team's main responsibilities among others are:

  • Scanning of security forums/mailing list(s) to detect security vulnerabilities reported by community
  • Responsible for fixing CVEs in the Yocto releases & maintained branches
  • Evaluation of tools for security tests
  • Responsible for security related info in the Yocto documentations
  • Hardening of Yocto release


How to Contact Yocto's security team Securely


We have set up two security-related mailing lists:

  • Public List
yocto [dash] security [at] yoctoproject[dot] com
This is a public mailing list for anyone to subscribe to. This list is an open list to discuss public security issues/patches.
  • Private List
security [at] yoctoprojct [dot] org (Forwards to the following addresses)
- sona [dot] sarmadi [at] enea [dot] com
- mhalstead [at] linuxfoundation [dot] org
For secure communications, please send your messages encrypted to both using the following GPG keys.
Remember message headers are not encrypted so do not include sensitive information in the subject line.
Download public keys: Sona Sarmadi Michael Halstead

Anyone can contribute Yocto with security patches as before, but those volunteering to this security team will sync/organize security related activities and take more responsibility


What you should do if you find a security vulnerability


If you find a security flaw; a crash, an information leakage or anything that can have a security impact if exploited in any Open Source packages used by Yocto Project, please report this to the Yocto Security Team. If you prefer to contact the upstream project directly, please copy security team at Yocto as well. If you believe this is a sensitive information, please report the vulnerability in a secure way, i.e. encrypt email and send it to the private list. This ensures that the exploit is not leaked and exploited before a response/fix has been generated.


What Yocto Security Team do/does when they receive a security vulnerability


The team performs a quick analysis and reports the flaw to the upstream project. Normally the upstream projects, analyzes the problem. If they deem that it is a real security problem in their software, the project then mail the linux-distros mailing list and notify all the big Linux distributions/vendors about the existence of this vulnerability/flaw. These mailing lists are normally non-public. The project and people on the linux-distros then can agree on a release date when the flaw should be made public. There’s also sometimes some coordination for handling patches or backporting of patches etc, or just understanding the problem or what caused it.

When the security issue is finally to be made public, normally upstream project is responsible to contact Mitre (cve.mitre.org) to get a CVE number assigned to it and copy other Opens Source Security mailing lists to inform the whole world of vulnerability.


If an upstream project does not respond quickly


If an upstream project does not fix the problem the Yocto's Security Team will contact linux-distros and community and together try to solve the vulnerability as quickly as possible. Normally big Linux vendors fix the problem if the problem affects their products. Chances are that everyone from the enterprise distros to the commercial Yocto vendors will get fixes done first, but it is nice to have saftey net for issues that really are specific to oe and embedded.

Branches maintained with security fixes

Major version Current Version Branch name BitBake version Maintainer
1.7 1.7 dizzy 1.24 Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
1.6 1.6.1 daisy 1.22 Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
1.5 1.5.3 dora 1.20 Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
1.4 1.4.3* dylan 1.18 Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
1.3 1.3.2 danny 1.16 Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>


All CVEs (security patches) should be backported to all branches above (if at all possible). Versions in grey are no longer actively maintained, but well-tested security patches may still be accepted for them.)


See Stable branches maintenancefor detailed info regarding the policies and maintenance of Stable branch

Kernel security patches

Kernel security patches are backported to Linux-yoco kernels regularly from https://www.kernel.org/

Linux-yocto

linux-yocto_3.10 & linux-yocto_3.14 (maintainer: Bruce Ashfield)

Vendor kernels

Kernel security patches are also backported to Linux-vendor kernels from https://www.kernel.org/

  • meta-intel (meta-intel uses Linux-yocto)
  • meta-fsl-ppc (meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org)
  • meta-xilinx (meta-xilinx@lists.yoctoproject.org)
  • meta-ti (meta-ti@yoctoproject.org)
  • etc

How to test

If there is any test case for the vulnerability by the upstream project or community

- Run the test to reproduce the problem and verify the correction. 
- Run the regression test

If there isn’t any test case and it is complicated and time consuming to write a testcase

- Run the regressions test


Regression test

  • Build the core image for at least two architectures (preferably one big-endian and one little-endian)
  • Run ptest (for those branches/packages that there is ptest mechanism)

Patch name convention and commit message

Security patches should have reference to the CVE identifier both in the patch file/s and the commit comment.

Please make sure to add the package name in the subject and the reference to the CVE. Example for the commit comment:

   bash: CVE-2014-6278
   
   <short description>
   
   <[YOCTO #xxx] if there is any>
   
   References
   E.g. link to CVE or other useful info/blog/advisory.
   
   Signed-off-by: 
   

For additional guidelines refer to: Commit Patch Message Guidelines

Some security related links/useful tools

Security Issues Addressed in Yocto Releases

Yocto 1.7.1 - Dizzy https://www.yoctoproject.org/downloads/core/dizzy171

Yocto 1.7 - Dizzy https://www.yoctoproject.org/downloads/core/dizzy17

Yocto 1.6 - Daisy https://www.yoctoproject.org/downloads/core/daisy16