Yocto 1.1 Features: Difference between revisions
(cleaned up wording) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Potential Yocto | == Potential Yocto Project 2011.10 Features == | ||
Yocto | Yocto Project 2011.10 (a.k.a. Yocto Project 1.1) - Target release = October 2011 | ||
== Yocto 1.1 Themes == | == Yocto 1.1 Themes == |
Revision as of 14:15, 30 March 2011
Potential Yocto Project 2011.10 Features
Yocto Project 2011.10 (a.k.a. Yocto Project 1.1) - Target release = October 2011
Yocto 1.1 Themes
The topics below are the themes that some members of the team have started brainstorming for Yocto 1.1. These will grow and change with community input.
Yocto 1.1 Objectives
The objectives of the Yocto 1.1 release are to grow participation in Yocto and increase the number of BSPs written for Yocto and partner products based on Yocto.
Yocto 1.1 Theme List
The Yocto 1.1 Themes towards the Objectives listed above are:
- Multilibs & OE-core config - This work, which began in Yocto 1.0, needs to be completed.
- Improve ease of BSP creation - Document the lifecycle and process. Possibly create walkthroughs or tutorials to integrate a new board into the linux-yocto kernel.
- Build performance – Get to the goal of 1 hour build time on a developer machine.
- Upstreaming – Submit patches to upstream projects in order to reduce the 2,000+ patches which are currently part of Yocto Project.
Process for Entering New Feature Requests
- Create a new entry in the appropriate feature table below (Poky, SDK, Hardware)
- Suggestion: start by copying an existing request as a template
- Give the feature a short, descriptive name
- Provide a one or two sentence brief description of the feature
- Set the priority as appropriate (see the legend below)
- Set the Status to "Review"
- In the Source field, enter your name along with the origination of the request (e.g. OSV, OEM, Community) if applicable; provide as much detail here as you can
- In the Comments / Bugzilla field, provide any additional information for the request, such as a link to a bugzilla entry
- Preview your Entry to make sure it looks ok and then save it
Legend
Priority: 1 = Must Have, 2 = Nice to Have, 3 = Optional
Status: Accept = Engineering agreement to include in release, Review = Under Review for Inclusion in this release, Reject = Will not be included in this release
Sample Table
This is a sample table to show how to submit features.
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
Placeholder feature name | Placeholder description of the feature | 1, 2, or 3 | Review | name | Comment |
Architecture
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
Layer Tooling | This includes the architectural work plus implementing the changes. | 1 | Review | Architect | M2; Owner = Richard |
OE-Core | Restructuring, renaming, rebranding | 1 | Review | RP Notes | M1; Owner = Richard |
Poky/Bitbake
This section contains features for the Poky/Bitbake infastructure.
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
Error handling in bitbake | desc | 1 | Review | RP Notes | M2; Owner = Saul |
crazygit fetcher | TI issues with fetch2 | 2 | Review | RP Notes | |
multi-lib | multi-lib support for 32-bit & 64-bit and capable of being installed at the same time | 1 | Review | from 1.0 | M1; Owner = Richard |
Image Creator | finish the Image Creator to add features pushed out from 1.0 | 1 | Review | from 1.0 | M2; Owner = Josh + someone else (Dave investigating someone on Jessica's team) |
Recipe-specific sysroot | 3 | Review | from 1.0 | ||
Handle old versions in WORKDIR | 3 | Review | from 1.0 | ||
Package config option enhancement | need to plan and then implement | 2 | Review | from 1.0 | |
Clean up warning messages | A build that runs correctly to completion still includes a ton of WARNING messages. We need a project to clean these up. | 2 | Review | davest and RP |
QA Items
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
QA Framework Enhancements |
|
?? | Review | QA | |
Open Source Test Cases | Perform technical, legal, and QA steps necessary to move test cases into open source. | 3 | Review | QA | |
Automated test infrastructure | Automate the test infrastructure | 2 | Review | QA | |
Test framework | this is a test framework that we can include in the distribution | 3 | Review | RP Notes | |
Be prepared for Distro upgrades | Our release is right around the time of the 6monthly distro release dates, we should accommodate for this in our testing plan | 2 | Review | Joshua |
Meta-data
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
Upstream our patches | We'll add this as a task in a milestone to give people time to do | 1 | Review | Meta-data | M2; Owner = Saul |
3G | We have an ofono recipe but need some integration work doing | 2 | Review | Meta-data | |
btrfs | 2 | Review | Meta-data | ||
Other components? | Saul will investigate other components. | 2 | Review | Meta-data | |
Replacement for video/audio players currently in Yocto | Codec… | 3 | Review | Meta-data | |
Investigate New UI | For demos, we would like need a reference UI that is not Sato. Investigate possibilities that the Yocto team won't need to maintain. OpenBox? Gnome-desktop? GP? LXDE? KDE Mobile? | 3 | Review | Meta-data | |
Qemugl upstreaming | Opengl ES Support | 3 | Review | Meta-data | |
Sync qemugl with MeeGo | 2 | Review | Meta-data | ||
Package reporting system enhancement | 2 | Review | Meta-data | ||
pam patch integration | add PAM patches throughout the system switchable via the PAM feature (Mark H) | 2 | Review | Meta-data | |
selinux patch integration | add SE Linux patches in a similar way to PAM | 3 | Review | Meta-data | |
Finish LSB "distribution" work | Merge patches which are pushed during ycoto 1.0. Add packages LSB Test Suite need. Hardware platform x86, x86-64 and ppc32(if qt4 can be supported) can be finished. | 2 | Review | Meta-data | M2; Owner = Xiaofeng Yan, Jingdong Lu, Kai kang,Xudong Hao |
OE Comparison | Compare Yocto core set against integration work in OE and other distributions looking for bug fixes, (relevant) feature enhancements, and integration/policy hints. | 1 | Review | Meta-data | M1; Owner = Mark |
Framework to support multiple library versions co-existing | similar to recipe specific sysroot; needs documentation | 2 | Review | Team | |
Embedded java environment or even JDK support | 3 | Review | Team | ||
Automatically generate package repos | automatically generate package repositories (and be able to "use them" -- to be defined) for both ipk and rpm/zypper combinations; NEEDS MORE DISCUSSION | 2 | Review | Team | |
MeeGo GPLv2 Sync | compare with Yocto, sync any patches | 2 | Review | RP Notes | |
Incompatible License | 2 | Review | Paul | ||
End of package revision | replace with a network service | 2 | Review | RP Notes | Owner = Jessica |
Target module build | Allow for building kernel modules on the target device | 2 | Review | RP Notes | Owner = Darren |
Live images | make live images their own image type | 2 | Review | RP Notes | Owner = Saul |
multiple update-alternatives | fixed? | 3 | Review | RP Notes | |
init scripts | provide an image/recipe skeleton as a canonical example | 3 | Review | RP Notes | |
running post installs at rootfs gen time | 2 | Review | RP Notes | ||
remove gnome-vfs | 3 | Review | RP Notes | ||
gtk+ sato filechooser patch | 3 | Review | RP Notes | ||
sato refresh | 3 | Review | RP Notes | ||
adding eglibc config control | this goes with the package config options | 1.5 | Review | RP Notes | M2; Owner = Mark |
Sanity checks on per recipe basis | 2 | Review | RP Notes | ||
x32 | layer to support toolchain, libc, and kernel | 2 | Review | RP Notes | |
User Creation at postinstall | 1 | Review | RP Notes | M1; Owner = Mark | |
Directory Ownership | 1.5 | Review | RP Notes | M2; Owner = Mark | |
Optimise Configure | 2 | Review | RP Notes | Performance idea | |
Ability to build SRPM | 3 | Review | RP Notes | ||
Check SRCREV in recipe files | should work, may need dev | 2 | Review | RP Notes | |
Add Directfb(license LGPL) function | Directfb is more appropriate embedded device than other graphic software | 3 | Review | Meta-data | M3;Owner = Xiaofeng Yan if possible |
BSPs
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
Support for AVX as in kernel 2.6.30. - Already in 1.0 | Any toolchain support needed? | 1 | Review | Jay | M1; Owner = Saul |
ADT
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
More test cases about toolchain in autobuilder | 2 | Review | ADT Team | Owner = Jessica | |
Eclipse-native tools interface | not using oprofile-UI. More integrated with upstream | 2 | Review | ADT Team | |
Indigo update | Update to the latest Eclipse release (Indigo) | 2 | Review | ADT Team | M2; Owner = Jessica |
Changes for Image Creator | Eclipse changes pending Image Creator | 1 | Review | ADT Team | M2; Owner = Jessica |
Secure logging | 2 | Review | ADT Team | ||
Prebuit SDK integration | speedup target image generation by reusing prebuilt tools from SDK native and target binaries. See: http://wiki.secretlab.ca/Yocto_prebuilt_SDK_integration | 2 | Review | Adrian |
Documentation
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
Package Documentation Audit | Make changes defined in the package documentation audit from Yocto 1.0 | 2 | Review | from 1.0 | Owner = Saul |
Yocto Project Development Guide | This manual would be an over-arching document that frames the complete development cycle within Yocto Project. The idea here is that the document would be an umbrella document that spawned and referenced subsequent documents. The organization would be the first chapter overviews the major development pieces such as recipe creation, building, debugging, publishing, fail-safing, back-door hook creation, etc. This manual will also include migration information. Scoping would be about two weeks and length would probably be about 40 pages. Overall development time will likely take up to the release given my experience on the creation of the ADT manual (there is no uniterruped time). | 1 | Not Started | from scratch | Owner = ScottR |
Various Demo Videos | The idea here is to create screen-capture type tutorials similar to what exists for the ADT Eclipse Plug-in. However, we want to contract out some help for professional voice-over talent to be used with the images. These don't have to be limited to screen-capture material but could include well-done PPT decks - similar to how other business units in Intel create various training modules. For 1.1 it would be good to capture the script for the existing ADT Eclipse Plug-in module and have it voiced over. Also, for 1.1 it would be good to create a similar module for the Image Creator application. | 2 | Not Started | From ADT module and scratch | Owner = ScottR |
Open-source Newbie Information | This information will be for developers new to open-source. These people do not know what IRC means. Targeted for developers coming from a non-open-source environment. I think the best place for this information would be the website. I haven't looked yet but I suspect information already exists on the web. For Yocto it will be a matter of collecting the best and most useful information, orginizing it and properly referencing/leveraging it. | 2 | Not Started | From scratch | Owner = ScottR |
Tarball Doc process | Right now tarball docs are frozen shortly before a release. The tarball never gets updated beyond that during subsequent documentation development. However, website docs are periodically updated as changes are made during the next development cycle. We need a documentation process where the tarball docs are updated along with the website docs. Perhaps releasing and building a separate documentation tarball is an answer... This whole scheme needs thought about and something implemented. | 3 | Not Started | From scratch | Owner = ScottR |
OOB documentation | Create an out of box guide for giveaway systems built using Yocto. | 1 | Review | Julie | Owner = ScottR |
Build
This section contains requirements related to the build (autobuilder activities, performance, footprint, etc.)
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
Autobuilder maintenance | Bring scripts into configuration or get git repo working for those that can't be brought in. | 1 | Review | Beth | M1; Owner = Beth |
Meta targets | Part of the challenge of autobuilder is that you have to go into autobuilder, edit script, reconfigure, to change just one build target. This is error prone. What we need is a meta-target where Beth can say she wants to build Poky-image-sato for QEMU x86 and have it just do that. Beth thinks this is done via an override to the web page. (takes ~2 weeks) | 1 | Review | Beth | M2; Owner = Beth |
License tracking | Get common licenses for all packages. (takes ~3 days) | 1 | Review | Beth | M1; Owner = Beth |
License history | Build a parser to do license history more gracefully and make sure all recipes are correct. (takes ~2 weeks) | 1 | Review | Beth | M2; Owner = Beth |
Audotbuilder infrastructure | Bring up additional autobuilders and work with sysadmin to configure. | 1 | Review | Beth | M2; Owner = Beth |
Overall Project | Host a retrospective to discuss what went well and what can be improved in Yocto 1.0. | 1 | Review | Beth | M1; Owner = Beth |
Release Scripts | Create Release Scripts for OCT 2011 release. | 1 | Review | Beth | M3; Owner = Beth |
Enhanced Performance | Also, environmental requirements/suggestions for expected performance; Goal is to build in under 1 hour | 2 | Review | from 1.0 | |
Disk Space Reduction | 2 | Review | Team | ||
Share gcc work directories | 2 | Review | Team | ||
Patch Test System | Create a machine where developers can upload/test patches before submitting them to master to ensure builds won't break when patches are added. | 2 | Review | Team | |
build statistics reporting | As someone interested in how long it takes to build different images on different hardware configurations and other assorted build metrics, I would like a web based service, that takes output generated by an extended buildstats.bbclass and stores it, to compare against different machines. The end result should be a way to visualize the collected data. See: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Buildbot_Autobuilder_Discussions | Review | eflanagan/Jay7/ka6sox | ||
BSP builds | Autobuilder git fetcher improvements | 2 | Review | from 1.0 | M1; Owner = Beth |
Implement Continuous Autobuilds | Build constantly instead of daily | 2 | Review | from 1.0 | M1; Owner = Beth |
Performance and Usability
This section contains general Yocto performance as well as usability items.
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
Fast boot time | 2 second boot time target | 1 | Review | Team | M2; Owner = Darren |
Build Yocto behind firewall | Darren will investigate site.conf and documentation | 2 | Review | Dave | |
Minimal Image unique | make minimal image smaller | 3 | Review | Team | |
POSIX support | address POSIX failures found in 1.1 | 2 | Review | Team |
Kernel
This section contains items specific to the Yocto kernel.
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
BSP kernel config audit | audit kernel configs for the various BSPS | 2 | Review | Team | |
Tracing: perf trace scripting support | we think usability is the direction to focus on, we want to improve usability through documentation | 2 | Review | from 1.0 | |
Tracing: tuna, oscilloscope recipes | catch up with Tom, likely to remove | 3 | Review | from 1.0 |
Project-Wide Features
This section contains features for the entire project or for the project website or mailing lists.
Feature Name | Description | Priority | Status | Source | Comments / Bugzilla Links |
Patchwork | is it worth the overhead, are there alternatives | 3 | Review | RP Notes | |
Alpha | Begin an alpha program after the stabilization period for M3. | 1 | Review | Team | |
Bugzilla to Wiki | Create a script which automatically populates and updates the Wiki based on changes in bugzilla. | ? | Review | Darren |