Weekly cdade0e68c645473d94e1b05020b064df40677e81: Difference between revisions
From Yocto Project
Jump to navigationJump to search
Lucian Musat (talk | contribs) (Created page with " [https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/QA_sanity_history < Back] <br />Ran on a genericx86-64-lsb_nuc and compared with commit dade0e68c645473d94e1b05020b064df40677e81 {| class=...") |
Lucian Musat (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|- style="background-color:#F0F8FC; padding:10px;" | |- style="background-color:#F0F8FC; padding:10px;" | ||
|Package Name ||Tests ran ||Passed ||Failed ||Passrate ||Last Passrate ||Run difference | |Package Name ||Tests ran ||Passed ||Failed ||Passrate ||Last Passrate ||Run difference | ||
|- | |||
|genericx86-64-lsb_nuc ||49 ||style="background-color:#F78D72;" |40 ||style="background-color:#F78D72;" |6 ||style="background-color:#F78D72;"|82.0% ||style="background-color:#C4FF33;"|98.0% ||style="background-color:#F78D72;"|<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="overflow: hidden;">Yes<div class="mw-collapsible-content"><p>Results for genericx86-64-lsb_nuc weekly runtime 2016-05-24:<br />********************************</p><p><b>Tests that failed now and worked last time:</b> 6</p>testcase-961<br />testcase-1096<br />testcase-test_1_logrotate_setup<br />testcase-215<br />testcase-211<br />testcase-1059<br /><p><b>Tests that passed now and and failed last time:</b> 0</p><br /><p><b>Tests that were skipped now and worked last time:</b> 9</p>testcase-1142<br />testcase-200<br />testcase-203<br />testcase-205<br />testcase-204<br />testcase-207<br />testcase-206<br />testcase-234<br />testcase-316<br /><p><b>Tests that were skipped last time and worked now:</b> 0</p><p><b>Tests that failed now:</b> 6</p>testcase-961<br />testcase-1096<br />testcase-test_1_logrotate_setup<br />testcase-215<br />testcase-211<br />testcase-1059</div></div> | |||
|- | |||
|genericx86-64-lsb_nuc ||58 ||style="background-color:#C4FF33;" |53 ||style="background-color:#F78D72;" |3 ||style="background-color:#C4FF33;"|91.0% ||style="background-color:#F78D72;"|82.0% ||style="background-color:#F78D72;"|<div class="toccolours mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" style="overflow: hidden;">Yes<div class="mw-collapsible-content"><p>Results for genericx86-64-lsb_nuc weekly runtime 2016-05-24:<br />********************************</p><p><b>Tests that failed now and worked last time:</b> 0</p><br /><p><b>Tests that passed now and and failed last time:</b> 3</p>testcase-961<br />testcase-215<br />testcase-211<br /><p><b>Tests that were skipped now and worked last time:</b> 0</p><br /><p><b>Tests that were skipped last time and worked now:</b> 9</p>testcase-1142<br />testcase-200<br />testcase-203<br />testcase-205<br />testcase-204<br />testcase-207<br />testcase-206<br />testcase-234<br />testcase-316<p><b>Tests that failed now:</b> 3</p>testcase-1096<br />testcase-1059<br />testcase-test_1_logrotate_setup</div></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 13:05, 2 June 2016
< Back
Ran on a genericx86-64-lsb_nuc and compared with commit dade0e68c645473d94e1b05020b064df40677e81
| Package Name | Tests ran | Passed | Failed | Passrate | Last Passrate | Run difference |
| genericx86-64-lsb_nuc | 49 | 40 | 6 | 82.0% | 98.0% | |
| genericx86-64-lsb_nuc | 58 | 53 | 3 | 91.0% | 82.0% |
