Weekly 21823cb466e79540567ad1a43ae6f93d850e4057

From Yocto Project
Jump to navigationJump to search

< Back
Ran on a qemux86 and compared with commit 8debfea81e69d038bd2d56314b272cb74f5582ed

Results
Package Name Tests ran Passed Failed Passrate Last Passrate Run difference
qemux86 55 55 0 100.0% 100.0%
No
qemux86_64 55 55 0 100.0% 100.0%
No
genericx86-64_nuc 55 54 1 98.0% 96.0%
Yes

Results for genericx86-64_nuc weekly runtime 2016-03-28:
********************************

Tests that failed now and worked last time: 1

testcase-1059

Tests that passed now and and failed last time: 2

testcase-1096
testcase-723

Tests that were skipped now and worked last time: 0


Tests that were skipped last time and worked now: 0

Tests that failed now: 1

testcase-1059
qemuarm 55 55 0 100.0% 100.0%
No
genericx86-64-lsb_nuc 57 56 0 98.0% 96.0%
Yes

Results for genericx86-64-lsb_nuc weekly runtime 2016-03-28:
********************************

Tests that failed now and worked last time: 0


Tests that passed now and and failed last time: 1

testcase-1059

Tests that were skipped now and worked last time: 0


Tests that were skipped last time and worked now: 0

Tests that failed now: 0

qemumips 55 55 0 100.0% 100.0%
No
qemuppc 55 55 0 100.0% 100.0%
No
wic_NUC_1 43 43 0 100.0% 98.0%
Yes

Results for wic_NUC_1 weekly runtime 2016-03-28:
********************************

Tests that failed now and worked last time: 0


Tests that passed now and and failed last time: 1

testcase-1059

Tests that were skipped now and worked last time: 0


Tests that were skipped last time and worked now: 0

Tests that failed now: 0